That’s a pretty silly interpretation of what occurred!

Timestamp 5:17 voters should be required to receive training and be permitted. www.youtube.com/watch?v=e93S-nui1uY

pantagraph.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/macon-county-judge-finds-state-gun-ban-v...

Can you tell me how the following gun control bills pass the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision and test laid out? Bills: HB 1178 HB 1143 HB 1144 HB 1240 HB 1195 SB 5078 www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf To be clear, AG Bob Ferguson has universally argued that gun control “saves lives” and used that argument in court. The Bruen decision ruled that unconstitutional, and vacated two federal cases because of their using an unconstitutional legal argument. One for an assault weapons ban, and one for a 10 round magazine ban. lawnews.tv/supreme-court-sends-back-gun-cases-for-further-review/ In Heller and McDonald, we held that the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense. In doing so, we held unconstitutional two laws that prohibited the possession and use of handguns in the home. In the years since, the Courts of Appeals have coalesced around a “two-step” framework for analyzing Second Amendment challenges that combines history with means-end scrutiny. Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. In keeping with Heller, we hold that when the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct. To justify its regulation, the government may not simply posit that the regulation promotes an important interest. Rather, the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Only if a firearm regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s “unqualified command.” Additionally, we were told that the gun control already passed would “save lives”, but the law enforcement violent crime stats prove otherwise, including record homicides across our state. In short, either you’re going to have to vote down these laws and protect people’s rights, or you’re going to have a very expensive legal bill on your hands, lose in court, and have the public wonder why we spent millions, accomplished nothing, and could have used the money on things like more teachers, police officers, or fixing our roads.